Lucy Hale Admires Fashion Tastes of Vanessa Hudgens and Miley Cyrus

July 30th, 2010



On Pretty Little Liars, Lucy Hale makes it clear that she can keep a secret.

But the 21-year old actress held nothing back in an interview this week with WhoWhatWear dot com. She talked to the website about her fashion tastes and those of celebrities she admits. A few excerpts follow:

On her fashion evolution: “When I was 16, I wasn’t a risk taker; I was very basic, just jeans and t-shirts. I loved fashion, I loved looking at it, and I could admire the people who took those risks, but I could never do it. I’m proud of myself that I’m willing to take the extra step and do something a little different now.”

On her style icons: “I love the classic [style icons] like Kate Moss and Sienna Miller, but I really admire girls my age, like Vanessa Hudgens and Miley Cyrus, for their everyday style.”

On her style staple: “I like to look really feminine – I’m all about dresses, heels, hair and makeup – but then again, I’m also obsessed with my Steve Madden motorcycle boots. I’m still finding myself and figuring out what my signature style is. There’s nothing I wouldn’t try at this point.”

Lucy H.

Lucy Hale PicLucy Hale PhotoHale, Lucy

View full post on The Hollywood Gossip

Mike Ragogna: Listening Booth 1970: A Conversation With Marc Cohn

July 30th, 2010

2010-07-30-51sKWlZgMnL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

A Conversation With Marc Cohn

Mike Ragogna: Listening Booth: 1970 is a concept album that compiles your favorite–and many would feel greatest–songs from that year.

Marc Cohn: That’s basically it. It’s a record of my favorite songs from 1970, and exactly 40 years ago, all these songs came out.

MR: And every one of these songs is seminal.

MC: My producer John Leventhal and I sat in the studio and went through all these amazing tunes. It became clear to me that these were great songs, but it was really the beginning of when I decided I wanted to be a musician. Because for me, not for everyone, but definitely for me, 1970 was the beginning of the Golden Age of the album. Especially when it came to singer-songwriters, and it was still the golden age of the single. There was so much range to the music that year. There were these deeply soulful records like Moondance from Van Morrison, Sweet Baby James by James Taylor, Bridge Over Troubled Water by Simon & Garfunkel…I mean the list goes on and on and on. Tea For The Tillerman by Cat Stevens…lot’s of great singles like “Tears Of A Clown” by Smokey Robinson.

MR: And if you look back at that year purely from the classics introduced that have stayed in the culture, it’s obvious 1970 was musically an important year.

MC: The most interesting and compelling thing that I realized was that 1970 was the year that The Beatles broke up. Yet, that year, John, Paul, and George each essentially put out solo records and became solo singer-songwriters. So, this was just a fascinating transitional time in a way, but also for me being about 11 years old and completely predisposed to music. It was the beginning of me really falling in love with records and albums and becoming obsessed as a fan. I was a little kid dreaming to find a way to make that a career, and that was the music that started me on that path.

MR: What went into choosing the songs for this new album?

MC: Well, once we decided to choose the songs from this great year, 1970, which was hugely influential for me and a lot of other people, mostly centered around a quartet of records. Moondance by Van Morrison, After The Gold Rush by Neil Young, Bridge Over Troubled Water by Simon & Garfunkel, Sweet Baby James by James Taylor, and a whole slew of other albums and singles. My producer and I went into the studio and started playing down a bunch of these songs and we had really two main criteria. One, we thought we could bring something fresh to the tune, something that was unusual and a different approach. And second, that nobody had covered it in a while so that it would not have been something that had been done or redone recently. Those were the two main things and once we had those criteria we went until we had 12 to 14 songs that we thought would make an interesting record.

MR: A lot of people remember the original mid-tempo version of “Wild World” by Cat Stevens, but you’ve rearranged it as a shuffle, and you’ve changed the tempos of and approaches to almost all of these songs.

MC: Well, the other thing I was really sort of going for on this record–besides finding these songs from 1970–was that I felt we could do something interesting with them. I was influenced by a lot of records by people like Sam Cooke. He came out with a record called Night Beat which a lot of people don’t know. It has this very cool, laid back, late night, unforced kind of feel. I was really trying to go for that as well. I was really trying to let this record sound good on a Sunday morning or a Saturday night, but a relaxing Saturday night; (laughs) one where you could really just sit back and listen to the whole thing without feeling intruded upon. It would sort of draw you in. I really like records that can set a mood like that. So, that was part of what we were going for too. Once we found that the laid back approach was working on certain tunes, we by-and-large kept it on almost all the tracks except for one or two.

MR: Do you have any revealing stories about any of the songs on this album?

MC: You know, I think “The Letter” was a very pivotal track for me. We only cheated chronologically on this great song because the original version of it was done by The Box Tops, a great pop band from the ’60s. Alex Chilton was the lead singer of that group who later went on to sing in Big Star. A great Memphis musician, in fact, who recently just passed away. But that original version came out in ‘67. Then another enormous version came out in ‘70 by Joe Cocker, and my producer and I loved that song so much. We felt like that laid back approach would really work on this tune. So, we made a little bit of an exception.

The original version wasn’t from 1970, but one of the biggest covers is. It just felt great while we were cutting it. We found out that Alex Chilton passed away, so it was kind of a bittersweet experience recording it. But I’m really happy it’s on the record even though ‘67 is the original version, it’s a great song written by a guy named Wayne Carson Thompson. I think the only other hit that guy had was “Always On My Mind,” but those are like two huge towering songs. I really dig our version a lot; it has that feel, and I think it really works well with that song.

MR: Wayne was a part of that American Recording crew.

MC: I don’t know as much about him as I know about Alex the singer of the tune, but I think you’re right.

MR: And now it’s time we get to your mega-hit “Walking In Memphis.” What’s the story behind it?

MC: That came about in a strange way. It was the late ’80’s when I wrote it, and I was a struggling songwriter at the time. I was trying to get a record deal and living in New York at the time. I happened to come across this interview with James Taylor, and they were talking about what he did to circumvent writers block when he experienced it. He was one of my all time early heroes, and he said take a train, or a plane, or get in your car, or go somewhere you’ve never been before. Sometimes, not always, your sensibilities may be shaken-up enough by the unfamiliarity of the place that you may start writing a tune that you never would have written before.

I thought that was a pretty interesting suggestion, and the first place I booked myself a ticket to was–because so many of my musical heroes came from there–Memphis. It turns out I didn’t have to take the other trips I planned because that trip turned out so well (laughs).

It was an amazing experience going there, and I think the centerpieces of that song are just verbatim recounting of what I did there. An example is in the bridge where I say, “Reverend Green be glad to see you if you haven’t got a prayer.” Reverend Green, in the tune, is Reverend Al Green, the great soul r&b legend. He has a church in Memphis, and almost any Sunday morning he is not on tour, you can go listen to him sing and preach. I’m a Jewish kid, but man, when I went to hear him sing in that church, I almost felt converted. Tears were streaming down my face, and it was an incredibly moving experience.

The other thing that happened was I went to this roadside shack called The Hollywood Cafe just outside of Memphis. I heard the woman I talk about in the third verse–Muriel, a real lady who was about 65 years old–playing these incredible gospel songs and standards. I ended up going onstage and singing with her and she changed my life. I went back home and those few days I spent in Memphis turned into that song. Really, it’s just a travel log of everything I had done while I was there.

MR: I remember playing that song to my godson who, at the time, was 9 years old. He listened to it, and afterward, he went to his room. I didn’t know if he was upset or not because it was a slow song or something. When he came out of his room, it turned out he had written a song. It was a really sweet thing to watch, your song inspiring a kid to go his room and write a song after hearing “Walking In Memphis.”

MC: Man, that’s one of the best stories I’ve ever heard about somebody being impacted by that song because that just reminds me of me. You know, I’m doing this record and we are talking about songs from Listening Booth: 1970 based on the impact of music that I heard when I was 10 or 11. The fact that music you hear when you’re at that age cuts you the deepest and stays with you the longest was true for me, and that sounds like it was true for the little guy you played my tune for. I mean, that’s what made me want to be a musician, having that impact that the deepest music has on you when you’re young. That’s a beautiful story, I can completely relate to it.

MR: John Leventhal basically produced this latest project with you.

MC: He produced this new record that’s about to come out, and he was involved as a musician from the very start with my first record. He played bass on “Walking In Memphis,” and guitar on the rest of that record, but I immediately knew that he was more than a hired hand. He has a brilliant musical mind, and he ended up co-producing The Rainy Season and co-produced my third record, Burning The Days, but I didn’t work with him on Join The Parade. I did that with another great musician named Charlie Sexton in 2007, but we came back together to do this record. Listening Booth… is as much John Leventhal’s record as it is mine. He’s playing almost every instrument except for the drums on almost every track. He is really a remarkable guy. He’s married to Roseanne Cash who he also produces. And he won a Grammy for Song of the Year and Record of the Year for co-writing and producing “Sunny Came Home” with Shawn Colvin. So, he’s a great musician who’s sort of the best kept secret in the music industry. If everything was just, he would be one of the greatest names in record production because he is truly, truly brilliant and I’m proud to have a partnership with him.

MR: When you were recording these tracks, were you ever worried about reinterpreting songs a little too much since we all have the original versions ingrained in us?

MC: Yes. To me as a listener, I only want to hear a cover or a new interpretation if it’s remarkably different. For me, it’s like what’s the use of doing something that was initially brilliant and well known if you don’t have anything to bring to it. So, that was really my attitude about that as a listener. With two of the tunes, I really had this struggle with myself, songs like “Into The Mystic” and “The Only Living Boy In New York.” Those two songs are huge for me and so important in my development as a musician and a music fan. I really was worried about approaching those songs in particular. But when we were done with “The Only Living Boy In New York,” I thought our version was so different and still very relevant and it brought out another angle in the tune. I felt very good about that version.

“Into The Mystic” was a little more difficult because, to me, it comes from one of the best albums of all time, Moondance. “Into The Mystic,” as a track, is just transcendent. I listen to that and it’s miraculous. I’ve been singing that live on and off for 20 years because I love it so much, and I think we came up with a different approach that I thought was interesting.

MR: You bravely make a couple of offbeat song choices such as The Grateful Dead’s “New Speedway Boogie.” That was very clever.

MC: Thank you. The thing to me that was fun about making this record–and I think the thing that will be fun for the listener whether they really tapped into 1970 or not–is the range. If I saw a record with a bunch of tunes that go from Simon & Garfunkel to Cat Stevens to Paul McCartney to Bread to The Grateful Dead, I would buy the thing because it sounds like utter folly. But I think the way we approached these tunes and the fact that I’m the singer on all of them, there’s the thread that runs through it that makes them all hang together. I think it’s also a fun record to listen to because of all of that range of music put side by side.

MR: What is your advice to new or young singer-songwriters?

MC: Somebody said to me a long time ago make sure it’s something you have to do because there are so many talented people that are not only talented, but motivated and driven. That’s the one thing that’s been clear to me as I’ve had my own career and I have watched other people. Some are my heroes and some people are younger then me. There’s a book that just came out that has something to do with talent being overrated. Basically, it’s just saying that the people that really make it, they have talent, but they mostly have a lot of drive. And I’ve been watching Springsteen my whole life and people like Neil Young and younger guys like Thom Yorke. These are geniuses in terms of their musical ability, but they work harder than anybody else, and I think you just have to be prepared to work really, really hard. There’s a lot of fun in having a career in music, but you have to have a certain amount of drive, and that’s what separates the boys from the men in the end.

MR: Recently, I had a conversation with Adam Levine from Maroon 5 who said the same thing: “Be prepared to work your butt off.”

MC: It’s good advice, it really is. I think now with the Internet, we’re a culture based on success and getting the fruits of success. I think a lot of kids miss the part of getting the fruits from labor. Maybe you get lucky and you have a year in the spotlight, but if you’ve been around for 5 years, you’re working, trying to figure out how to do this. So yeah, that’s really what it’s about, and being good is important but there is a lot more to it.

(transcribed by Theo Shier)

Tracks:
1. Wild World
2. Look At Me
3. Maybe I’m Amazed
4. Make It With You – with india.arie
5. The Letter
6. The Only Living Boy In New York
7. After Midnight
8. The Tears Of A Clown – with Kristina Train
9. No Matter What – with Aimee Mann
10. New Speedway Boogie – with Jim Lauderdale
11. Into The Mystic
12. Long As I Can See The Light

More on Paul McCartney



View full post on The Full Feed from HuffingtonPost.com

Unemployment benefits will begin phasing out

July 29th, 2010

Unemployment benefits will begin phasing out

The Bachelorette: Alternate Endings Filmed?

July 29th, 2010



With just a few days remaining until The Bachelorette season finale, speculation is still running rampant about what its star, Ali Fedotowsky, decides.

Does she choose Roberto Martinez or Chris Lambton? Does she reject both remaining suitors in what would amount to a huge emotional letdown?

Whatever the case, the show has done well keeping it under wraps. All Bachelorette spoilers we know are the same ones we’ve known for weeks.

Perhaps this is a testament to the greatness of Reality Steve, god among spoiler fiends for several seasons and perennial thorn in Mike Fleiss’ side.

While he stands by what he says happens (follow the link above to read about it), he admits he has been stymied somewhat regarding the finale.

There’s even a theory circulating that producers went so far as to film two different episodes of the After The Final Rose special as a smokescreen.

Ali Looking On

Are Ali Fedotowsky and The Bachelorette plotting a real surprise?

Ratings for the show have not exactly suffered as a result of spoilers leaking, but just the same, ABC would likely nix this occurrence if possible.

Would they really go to such lengths, though?

The lack of a single shot of the final rose ceremony in any preview to date is also strange. Could it be there is no ceremony or final rose doled out?

This theory is supported by Ali’s vague comments about her tough decision, being content with what she did, etc. But it could be part of the act.

Is it possible that, just maybe, producers and Ali Fedotowsky pushed the decision back until the After The Final Rose special, which is being secretly taped this week, and no one knows the outcome because it hasn’t been decided yet?

That’s just our hypothesis, but longtime host and pimp Chris Harrison said that something happens on the finale unlike anything we’ve seen before. We’ve seen people simply pick no one and go home. This would be unprecedented.

In any case, who do you think Ali should pick?

View full post on The Hollywood Gossip

50 Cent Weight Gain: Not So Skinny Anymore (PHOTOS)

July 29th, 2010

50 Cent is looking like himself again. He shocked fans in May when he tweeted photos of himself looking emaciated, having lost 54 pounds in nine weeks for a role as a cancer patient in ‘Things Fall Apart.’

The rapper lost the weight with a liquid diet and daily 3-hour workouts, and his first meal after he finished shooting was a steak.

“I remember specifically what the first thing was, because I was starving,” he said on the View Tuesday. “I had a steak. It was 12 ounces, but I got about four ounces in before I started getting sleepy.”

Below is a photo of 50 earlier this year, and two photos from Wednesday night at the ‘Twelve’ screening in New York.

PHOTOS:


More on Celebrity Body



View full post on The Full Feed from HuffingtonPost.com

Angelina Jolie Takes North Korea to Task

July 29th, 2010



Better watch your back, Kim Jong Il. Angelina Jolie will totally kick your ass. Oh, and your huge ’80s sunglasses look effing ridiculous, BTW. Just saying.

Jolie was in Seoul, South Korea, today to promote her latest action thriller, Salt, which opens with a scene that takes place in a North Korean prison.

That’s not her only connection with the Korean Peninsula, of course. The actress and humanitarian is deeply worried about the people of North Korea.

The persecution defectors face when repatriated to the rogue state appalled Jolie, a goodwill ambassador for the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees.

Seoul-based officials from the U.N. refugee agency brought the star up to date on the current state of affairs there, and she was naturally appalled.

Angie Pic

GOODWILL AMBASSADOR: Angelina Jolie is Salt. And awesome.

“They spoke a lot about the concerns about people being persecuted when they are sent back,” she said. “I’m very concerned about the people.”

Tens of thousands of people from impoverished North Korea have migrated to neighboring China in recent years, activists say, but it’s very risky.

Many are sent back due to an agreement between North Korea and China. Some 19,000 have made it to South Korea, where they are protected.

“I learned today about them gaining citizenship and crossing into South Korea,” Angelina Jolie, who was also promoting her movie, told reporters.

“The UNHCR practices quiet diplomacy in which they do more than they talk about.”

As always, kudos to Angelina for using her high-profile status to bring attention to issues and people who truly need it. She sets a great example.

View full post on The Hollywood Gossip

Chris Weigant: Cocaine Sentencing Injustice Slightly Lessened

July 29th, 2010

Crack cocaine, it is widely known, causes irrational behavior. I speak not of irrational behavior among the drug’s users, but rather among politicians. It has done so ever since crack appeared on the scene in America during the 1980s. Today it was announced that Congress has approved a bill (which will now head for President Obama’s desk) which will scale back the worst of the irrational legislation which passed in the Reagan era. Somewhat. In true incrementalist fashion, Democrats have now made things slightly less unfair, but fell far short of actual fairness. It’s as if, right after the Civil War, Congress announced that black people would now count as four-fifths of a person, instead of the previous three-fifths — in other words, a step towards equality, but not exactly the giant leap of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments. Which makes it rather hard to praise such an effort, even though it does represent (some) progress.

Crack cocaine is no different, really, than powder cocaine. They’re both the same thing, in other words — a chemical (or “drug”) that influences the human body. The only real difference between the two is that crack is in a form which can be smoked, and powder is in a form which can be snorted, or melted and injected. Powder actually can be smoked (or “freebased”) as well, but it requires some effort to do so — such as the use of ether to separate out the impurities, and the use of a very hot flame to ignite it. Ether, by the way, is highly flammable (one might accurately say “explosive”). And using a blowtorch around ether can lead to accidents, as Richard Pryor can attest to (as he later joked: “when you are running down the street… and you are on fire… people get out of your way“). Crack cocaine was developed to be easier to ignite, meaning you could smoke it using an ordinary cigarette lighter, instead of a blowtorch. This development occurred in the 1980s, as previously mentioned.

The politicians of the day freaked out. The appearance of crack, during one of the high points (pun intended) of Drug War hysteria (see: Nancy Reagan) caused politicians to fall all over themselves to pass tough-on-crime drug laws for this new crack epidemic, before machine-gun-wielding crack babies attacked the Capitol en masse.

The result was extremely harsh “mandatory minimum” sentences for the new form of the drug. If you were caught with as little as five grams of crack in your possession, you got five years in the slammer. Now, five grams is about what a street-level dealer might have on him (or her). It’s enough to get a limited number of people high, or enough to last a single crack smoker at least a week (the actual time would vary, depending on the user’s habit, of course). For comparison, a gram of any powdered substance (for those of us who have forgotten the metric system) is about the same amount as is in one of those little packets of sugar you get in a coffee shop. Five sugar packets’ worth of crack equaled five years in jail.

Now, it’s hard to stand up for a crack dealer’s rights. It was even harder back then when Congress was proposing such things. “Toss them all in jail, and throw away the key” was how the country’s thinking went at the time. This was before we surpassed the Soviet Union and China for the number and per-capita percentage of people in our jails, by the way.

There was only one problem with the whole scheme. And that was that Congress conveniently forgot to change the law for powdered cocaine at the same time. Which meant that to trigger the same five-year mandatory minimum sentence, you had to get caught with five hundred grams of powdered cocaine. Five hundred grams (again, for the metrically-impaired) is over a pound of coke (it’s close to a pound and an eighth). Which is a lot of cocaine, worth an enormous amount of money. We’re not talking about the corner dealer here, we’re not even talking about the guy the corner dealer buys his stuff from — we’re talking about the wholesaler who sells to the middleman who sells to the corner dealer. A major drug trafficker, in other words, and not some small fish who is feeding his own habit by selling to a few other folks.

From the Associated Press story about the new bill:

Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., the main sponsor of the bill in the Senate with Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., said last year close to 1,500 people were convicted for possession of somewhere between five and 25 grams of crack cocaine, subjecting them to mandatory minimum sentences.

Some 80 percent of those convicted of crack cocaine offenses are black.

In the 2008 campaign, Obama said the sentencing disparity “has disproportionately filled our prisons with young black and Latino drug users.” He cited figures that blacks serve almost as much time for drug offenses — 58.7 months — as whites do for violent offenses — 61.7 months.

The major impact of this law was to treat inner-city drug users and dealers much more harshly than the folks out in the suburbs doing a few lines. In other words, whether the intent was there or not by the politicians who passed this law, the upshot was that white people had a whole different set of laws than black and brown people — for what is essentially the same substance. The inherent unfairness of this should be readily evident to all.

But now, for the first time since the Drug War began, Congress has eliminated a mandatory minimum sentence (for first-time possession of crack cocaine). And it has changed the level of crack you must be caught with which triggers that five-year mandatory minimum — from five grams to 28 grams (which is roughly an ounce).

This is landmark legislation, I realize. Moving away from the “lock them all up” mentality, for politicians, is remarkable simply because it does not happen often (read: “ever”). Backing down on Draconian drug laws is not exactly atop the priorities list of many politicians, because the ads attacking them for doing so just about write themselves. So I do applaud Congress for addressing the issue (both houses have now passed the bill).

But, at the same time, what they’ve done is to change the ratio of unfairness from one-hundred-to-one (500:5) down to roughly eighteen-to-one (500:28). The penalties for crack and powder cocaine are still nowhere near parity. Someone possessing an ounce of crack will get a much stricter punishment than someone possessing a full pound of powder cocaine. It’s as if we decided to make coffee illegal, and instituted mandatory minimums for possessing five cups of coffee — while at the same time applying the same penalty only if you were caught with 500 cups of espresso. Or made water illegal, but set a much higher bar for possessing 500 ice cubes. Either way, it is the same substance. The only thing which differs is the penalty for the “lower class” version of the substance.

Meaning that even the newly-passed bill is not exactly an exercise in equality under the law. Not by a factor of eighteen. President Obama, to his credit, called for true fairness on the campaign trail, when he said that the disparity in crack/powder cocaine punishment “cannot be justified and should be eliminated.” He was right. It should be eliminated. Either start jailing a lot more suburban white kids (which would cause its own kind of outcry), or stop jailing inner-city folks disproportionally. Lower the bar for powder, or raise the bar for crack, in other words, until the penalty is equalized.

While Congress did not have the courage of their convictions to do so this time around, they did take a baby step in the right direction. This is momentous, because it is the first such step in this direction in three or four decades. But I still can’t help but wish that Congress had tackled the problem not in such an incrementalist political fashion, but rather as an issue of rank inequality to be rectified by removing all of the legally-codified unfairness at once — to restore the concept of equal treatment under the law, rather than perpetuating (if slightly lessening) the inherent injustice which still exists.

 

Chris Weigant blogs at:
ChrisWeigant.com

Follow Chris on Twitter: @ChrisWeigant

 

More on Barack Obama



View full post on The Full Feed from HuffingtonPost.com

Mickey Cargile – Unemployment – Jun 27 2010

July 29th, 2010

Mickey Cargile – Unemployment – Jun 27 2010

Kendall Jenner on Controversial Bikini Shoot: It’s All Good!

July 28th, 2010



As much as it pains us, we must give Kendall Jenner some credit.

The 14-year old half-sister of Khloe, Kourtney and Kim Kardashian responded this week to the controversy surrounding her recent photo shoot. Instead of getting on some high horse and telling the world to focus on more important issues (we’re looking at you, Miley Cyrus), Kendall came across as mature and understanding of the situation.

“I am excited to be working as a model, doing what I love to do,” she told People. “My entire family was very supportive, though my dad was a bit concerned at first, he knows that I am responsible enough that I wouldn’t do anything I wasn’t ready to do, or didn’t want to do.”

In a String Bikini

Kendall continued:

“Going into this shoot, it was never my intention to be provocative or too racy. It was a beach shoot, and I was wearing beachwear. I am happy with my age, and am not trying to rush into anything too soon. I look forward to all the milestones my teens have to offer – Sweet 16, turning 18, and so on.”

We still believe Jenner should wait a few years before donning so few items of clothing in a nationally-published shoot.

But at least she recognizes the reasons behind the scandal and acknowledges that she’s barely even a teenager. Gotta give her – or the publicist behind this statement, really – props for handling the situation in such a straightforward manner.

View full post on The Hollywood Gossip

Interview Sen Kyl right now about illegal immigration law

July 28th, 2010



View full post on The Full Feed from HuffingtonPost.com